Home » John Jay Distinguished Teaching » Selection Process

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Categories

    Meta

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

    Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

    Selection Process

    2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize Process

    We start by inviting nominations for the prize from our college community: students, faculty, and staff. Nominators may nominate more than one instructor; instructors may nominate themselves.

    For our first round of reviews, we invite those nominees who have taught for at least 3 consecutive years at the college to submit a sample assignment that represents their teaching and a rationale for the assignment design. Our reviewers, a volunteer team of faculty, students, and staff, read and rate the assignments and rationale according to a detailed rubric that creates equity in the ratings across disciplines.

    In the second round, those nominees who earned the highest ratings are invited to submit full dossiers that illustrate their teaching strengths and development. Second round nominees submit teaching philosophy statements, examples of their teaching, their CVs, and any supplemental materials they choose, such as letters of recommendation and student testimonials.

    Our second round reviewers read these dossiers and rate the overall presentation and content. The top scores in this round identify the semi-finalists, whose dossiers are discussed with the entire review committee, who engage in multiple rounds of discussion and voting to select our finalists.

    The review assignments for each round are matched to each nominee’s department or close discipline, shared understandings of particular teaching contexts, and when possible, at least one former Distinguished Teaching Prize winner and one current John Jay college student.

    a rainbow in grayish blue shades from light to dark illustrating the Distinguished Teaching Prize process through comparison of number of people involved at each step from greatest (Nominees) to fewest (Winners)
            2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize Selection Process

     

    In November to December 2024, student, faculty, and staff nominated 113 faculty for the award, the highest number of nominees in the past eight years. 19 of 24 departments and programs were represented, with Law, Police Science & Criminal Justice instructors earning the most nominations. Our 2025 winners come from our Psychology department (11 nominees) and Sciences department (8 nominees).

    Circles of multiple sizes in shades of blue representing numbers of 2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize nominees by department
               2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize Nominees by Department

    Distinguished Teaching 2017-2025

    More than 1,000 nominations have been submitted for the Distinguished Teaching Prize since 2017. An average number of 117 nominations are received each year. The number of winners and reviewers has remained relatively stable over the past 8 years; the spikes in nominations and nominators represent years in which more individual students identified and praised the instructors who had impacted their learning, career plans, and wellbeing. 

    Blue column chart showing total, average, fewest, and most nominations for the prize 2017-25
    2017-2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize Nomination Comparative Data
    line chart in shades of blue comparing prize selection process roles by number of participants from 2017-2025
    2017-2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize selection roles by participation

     

    Our students recognize the excellence and hard work of all their instructors: here we see the impact of part time faculty teaching on student learning.

    Pie chart in two shades of blue showing part time and full time prize nominees
    2017-2025 Full Time and Part Time Faculty Nominees

    Nearly half of the instructors nominated are nominated in multiple years, suggesting that students continue to have positive, meaningful instruction from many of the same teachers over time. We want to celebrate in particular those faculty who have been nominated six times in eight years:

    • Jill Frometa, Adjunct, Law, Police Science, and Criminal Justice Administration (2019, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025)
    • Richard Haw, Professor, Sociology & Interdisciplinary Studies (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024), 2021 Distinguished Teaching Prize winner
    • Evan Mandery, Professor, Criminal Justice (2017, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025)

     

    Pie chart in shades of blue comparing the number of unique and repeated prize nominees 2017-2025
    2017-2025 Distinguished Teaching Prize Unique & Repeated Nominees

     

     

    Bright blue column chart comparing number of nominees by number of years nominated
    2017-2025 Nominees by Number of Years Nominated